|
|
|
|
|
for i = 1:n,
k = i
for j = i+1:n, if a[j] < a[k], k = j
→ invariant: a[k] smallest of a[i..n]
swap a[i,k]
→ invariant: a[1..i] in final position
end
From the comparions presented here, one might conclude that selection sort should never be used. It does not adapt to the data in any way (notice that the four animations above run in lock step), so its runtime is always quadratic.
However, selection sort has the property of minimizing the number of swaps. In applications where the cost of swapping items is high, selection sort very well may be the algorithm of choice.
above to restart
the animations in a row, a column, or the entire table.
Algorithms in Java, Parts 1-4, 3rd edition by Robert Sedgewick. Addison Wesley, 2003.
Programming Pearls by Jon Bentley. Addison Wesley, 1986.
Quicksort is Optimal by Robert Sedgewick and Jon Bentley, Knuthfest, Stanford University, January, 2002.
Comments
— posted by someone on 27-Jan-2010
— posted by someone on 13-Jan-2010
— posted by someone on 20-Dec-2009
— posted by someone on 8-Dec-2009